Both the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal have delivered judgments on actions to protect trade marks in 2017. The Supreme Court’s decision in Crocodile International Pte Ltd v Lacoste involved a Lacoste trade mark (70068), which Crocodile International Pte Ltd had applied to revoke, arguing that Lacoste had not used it. The issue was [...]
Wills Consumer Credit Companies Act Merger Trusts FMA Liquidation Companies Office Asbestos Bright-Line Test Financial Markets Conduct Act Financial Services Credit Insolvent Transaction Consumer Guarantees Act PPSA Employee Share Schemes Property Schemes Lien Regulatory Systems Amendment Bill Insurance Digital Communications Land Transfer Act Overseas Investment Act Similar Work Bill of Rights NZBORA Commerce (Cartels and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2017 Securities Contracts Income Tax Act 2007 Managed Investment Schemes Meth Testing Residency Special Conditions CCCFA Commerce (Cartels and Other Matters) Amendment Bill 2011 Oppressive Conduct Securities Markets Act 1988 Commerce and Consumer Affairs Undue Influence New Zealand Commerce Commission Product Disclosure Trade Marks Restraint of Trade Property Law Employment Relations Authority Acts Disclosure Documents Deed of Guarantee Credit Fees Gifting Acid Test Permanent Place of Abode Fair Trading Act NZX Hazardous Substances Copyright NZCC Building Societies Act 1965 Contract Law Companies Financial Reporting Act Criminalisation Regulations Tax Consumer Protection Sale and Purchase Agreement Commissioner of Inland Revenue Company Directors Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 Treaty Settlement Health and Safety Act
This page does not comprise legal advice and its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. If you require legal advice on any of the topics canvassed on this page, please get in touch with your usual contact at Macalister Mazengarb.