In Sunder v Vasona Networks Inc  NZERA Wellington 69, Vasona Networks Inc (Vasona) was found to have unjustifiably dismissed a Mr Rajeev Sunder. Mr Sunder was awarded $10,000 by the Employment Relations Authority (ERA). In a subsequent costs determination, the ERA had new information to examine. Most importantly, it emerged that Vasona had during [...]
Companies Act Gifting NZX Asbestos Securities Contracts Wills Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Health and Safety Act PPSA CCCFA Trade Marks Regulations NZCC Companies Criminalisation Liquidation Copyright Special Conditions Managed Investment Schemes Product Disclosure Digital Communications Contract Law NZBORA Meth Testing Company Directors Disclosure Documents Sale and Purchase Agreement Financial Services FMA Financial Reporting Act Employee Share Schemes Tax Acid Test Merger Bill of Rights Building Societies Act 1965 Commissioner of Inland Revenue Restraint of Trade Consumer Credit Oppressive Conduct Fair Trading Act Income Tax Act 2007 Hazardous Substances Commerce (Cartels and Other Matters) Amendment Bill 2011 Insolvent Transaction Consumer Protection Similar Work Residency Property Schemes Regulatory Systems Amendment Bill Credit Commerce (Cartels and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2017 Land Transfer Act Consumer Guarantees Act New Zealand Commerce Commission Overseas Investment Act Financial Markets Conduct Act Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 Permanent Place of Abode Employment Relations Authority Trusts Companies Office Credit Fees Deed of Guarantee Bright-Line Test Insurance Lien Undue Influence Property Law Commerce and Consumer Affairs Treaty Settlement Acts Securities Markets Act 1988
This page does not comprise legal advice and its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. If you require legal advice on any of the topics canvassed on this page, please get in touch with your usual contact at Macalister Mazengarb.