The recent High Court decision in AXA New Zealand Nominees Ltd v 10 Gilmer Ltd (in rec) (HC, 6/12/2011) explained the issue of oppressive conduct in the context of a lender under a credit contract (including, but not limited to, consumer credit contracts). Section 118 of the CCCFA defines “oppressive” as “oppressive, harsh, unjustly burdensome, [...]
NZX Contracts Property Schemes Copyright Tax Credit Fees Disclosure Documents Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 FMA Wills Managed Investment Schemes Special Conditions Treaty Settlement Undue Influence Regulations Residency Similar Work New Zealand Commerce Commission Companies Office Property Law Bright-Line Test Digital Communications Insurance Restraint of Trade Trusts Insolvent Transaction Deed of Guarantee Hazardous Substances Lien PPSA Securities Markets Act 1988 Commerce (Cartels and Other Matters) Amendment Bill 2011 Consumer Credit Fair Trading Act Product Disclosure Income Tax Act 2007 Employee Share Schemes NZBORA Trade Marks Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 Merger Health and Safety Act Sale and Purchase Agreement Bill of Rights Commerce and Consumer Affairs Securities Gifting Employment Relations Authority Commerce (Cartels and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2017 Meth Testing Permanent Place of Abode Criminalisation Land Transfer Act Financial Services Building Societies Act 1965 Financial Reporting Act Companies Act Consumer Protection Overseas Investment Act Acid Test Acts Liquidation Companies Company Directors Oppressive Conduct Credit Financial Markets Conduct Act Commissioner of Inland Revenue Contract Law CCCFA Regulatory Systems Amendment Bill Consumer Guarantees Act NZCC Asbestos
This page does not comprise legal advice and its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. If you require legal advice on any of the topics canvassed on this page, please get in touch with your usual contact at Macalister Mazengarb.